Comments on: CARDINAL RULE: DON’T GET CAUGHT PETTING CRABS /cardinal-rule-dont-get-caught-petting-crabs/ Art and media blog of the unexpected Sat, 18 Dec 2010 04:15:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Dave /cardinal-rule-dont-get-caught-petting-crabs/comment-page-1/#comment-14800 Dave Sat, 31 Jul 2010 02:23:10 +0000 /?p=16561#comment-14800 Yes. I think the issue here is precisely what you stated: Lack of intellectual horsepower or unwillingness to use it if it was there; which is a form of self-mutilation. I have some empathy with Amiel, despite herself; she is just a bit more over the top than the countless others who would act the same way in the given circumstances. Yes. I think the issue here is precisely what you stated: Lack of intellectual horsepower or unwillingness to use it if it was there; which is a form of self-mutilation. I have some empathy with Amiel, despite herself; she is just a bit more over the top than the countless others who would act the same way in the given circumstances.

]]>
By: Marìa /cardinal-rule-dont-get-caught-petting-crabs/comment-page-1/#comment-14711 Marìa Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:56:22 +0000 /?p=16561#comment-14711 I studied psychology; one of the consequences of having done so, it is the compassion I feel towards people who fails; the difficulty to be judgmental and to being a judge altogether; was it possible for both Marie Antoinette and Barbara to be different had they had other experiences in early life? Maybe with a great intelligence they could have interpreted better the signs of their times. Marie Antoinette was the 11th child of an empress, sent to marry in France while still a child. Barbara knew since childhood poverty and real life, was educated: she is to me more guilty. When Bouddha got to know real life, he gave in all his privileges: was that the sign of a superior intelligence and a very rare kind personality? I studied psychology; one of the consequences of having done so, it is the compassion I feel towards people who fails; the difficulty to be judgmental and to being a judge altogether; was it possible for both Marie Antoinette and Barbara to be different had they had other experiences in early life? Maybe with a great intelligence they could have interpreted better the signs of their times.
Marie Antoinette was the 11th child of an empress, sent to marry in France while still a child.
Barbara knew since childhood poverty and real life, was educated: she is to me more guilty.
When Bouddha got to know real life, he gave in all his privileges: was that the sign of a superior intelligence and a very rare kind personality?

]]>