Comments on: Woodstock & The Sanctity of Illusion /woodstock-the-sanctity-of-illusion/ Art and media blog of the unexpected Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:05:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Dave /woodstock-the-sanctity-of-illusion/comment-page-1/#comment-23898 Dave Mon, 01 Nov 2010 04:03:52 +0000 /?p=3494#comment-23898 not that i know of. It was taken at random off the web. I think this was Woodstock 1994. not that i know of. It was taken at random off the web. I think this was Woodstock 1994.

]]>
By: Dave /woodstock-the-sanctity-of-illusion/comment-page-1/#comment-284 Dave Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:41:06 +0000 /?p=3494#comment-284 Yes. it kind of dawned on me to as I was writing. Like an archaeologist digging in deeper sands. The writing is a bit improvisational because of time constraints, but I.m glad I could convey some of what I think is not an implausible perception. thank-you for reading and your comment Dave Yes. it kind of dawned on me to as I was writing. Like an archaeologist digging in deeper sands. The writing is a bit improvisational because of time constraints, but I.m glad I could convey some of what I think is not an implausible perception.
thank-you for reading and your comment
Dave

]]>
By: Dave /woodstock-the-sanctity-of-illusion/comment-page-1/#comment-283 Dave Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:37:38 +0000 /?p=3494#comment-283 Really true. Woodstock is a symbol ( and sympton ) of something much larger and complex. It was a lot more than ''just three days of fun and music''. Thank-you for the read and the comment. Dave Really true. Woodstock is a symbol ( and sympton ) of something much larger and complex. It was a lot more than ”just three days of fun and music”. Thank-you for the read and the comment.
Dave

]]>
By: Clemento /woodstock-the-sanctity-of-illusion/comment-page-1/#comment-278 Clemento Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:26:11 +0000 /?p=3494#comment-278 In truth, immediately i didn't understand the essence. But after re-reading all at once became clear. In truth, immediately i didn’t understand the essence. But after re-reading all at once became clear.

]]>