George Ivanovich Gurdjieff was born in about 1872  in the Caucasus region of what is now Russia. The so called “rascal sage” heralded the coming of ancient and esoteric Eastern teachings to the West. Neither a modernist nor a purveyor of any “isms,” he rather proclaimed there to be eternal Truths, with a capital T, that there are people who know and live those Truths and that Objective knowledge of the Real is possible. His work lives on in various guises …

"The Magician's Sheep" GI Gurdjieff "There is an Eastern tale that speaks about a very rich magician who had a great many sheep. But at the same time this magician was very mean. He did not want to hire shepherds, nor did he want to erect a fence about the pasture where the sheep were grazing....continued in ADDENDUM

“To awake. to die. To be born”. Through this aphorism G.I. Gurdjieff expresses virtually his entire philosophy. With these words Gurdjieff came as close as he ever did to explaining how to acquire a soul. To this end his followers gladly sacrificed energy, time, money- even their lives. …

Timothy Hull:I have recently been very involved with the concept of Egypt. Mostly I have been doing drawings and making various objects that exemplify western man's long standing obsession with her mysteries and treasures. Egypt has been seen as a repository for esoteric knowledge and has been referenced in one way or another by almost every mystical/occult group. It has fascinated people from the Romans to the Victorians to the present day. I am fascinated by this fascination.

But in order to awake, one must first “remember oneself,” and the concept of self-remembering is one of the most difficult of all the puzzling ideas in Gurdjieff”s teaching. Even the philosopher and mathematician Ouspensky, an expert in handling abstract ideas , found it hard to define; after a great struggle, he concluded that it meant “directing attention on oneself without weakening or obliterating the attention directed on something else.” When a student complained that it was impossible to “self-remember,” Gurdjieff would answer, “What else do you want? People who know this already know a great deal… If a man really knows that he cannot remember himself, he is already near the understanding of his being.”

"Gurdjieff obviously had a powerful personality, but his disdain for the mundane and for natural science must have added to his attractiveness. He allegedly exuded extreme self-confidence and exhibited no self-doubt, traits which must have been comforting to many people. My favorite Gurdjieff story is told by Fritz Peters. To explain "the secret of life" to a wealthy English woman who had offered him £1,000 for such wisdom, Gurdjieff brought a prostitute to their table and told her he was from another planet. The food he was eating, he told her, was sent to him from his home planet at no small expense. He gave the prostitute some of the food and asked her what it tasted like. She told him it tasted like cherries. "That's the secret of life," Gurdjieff told the English lady. She called him a charlatan and left. Later that day, however, she gave him the money and became a devoted follower. He might have hit her with a stick like some Zen master and obtained the same result."

What made Gurdjieff’s system so exasperating at first to Ouspensky, and to all lovers of logic, was the ruthless way in which he destroyed their first halting attempts to understand it. This was deliberate, for Gurdjieff despised the overintellectualization of Western man. “You must feel, you must feel, your mind is a luxury!” he would shout. “Never think of results, just do!” He wanted to dismantle the human machines he saw around him and create men. To this end he gave his pupils a series of “shocks,” intellectual and emotional, designed to break them of their mechanical behavior.

Every meeting with Gurdjieff led Ousepnsky into greater complexities; the system to which he was being initiated has, in fact, filled severla books and defies easy summary. Gurdjieff himself did everything in his power to prevent it from becoming a system at all, and when pupils quoted his sayings back to him, he would often brush his own ideas aside as rubbish. Nevertheless, some themes kept recurring.

"What makes a guru such as Gurdjieff attractive as a spiritual conquistador is his seemingly shrewd observation that most human beings who are awake act as if they are asleep. Gurdjieff also observed that most people are dead on the inside. I think he meant by these claims that most people are passive sheep and need a guru to give their lives vitality and meaning. That is to say, I believe Gurdjieff correctly noted that most people are neither skeptics nor self-motivated, and that many are easily duped by gurus because they want someone to show them the way to live a meaningful life. He offered to show his followers the way to true wakefulness, a state of awareness and vitality which transcends ordinary consciousness. He was able to attract a coterie of writers, artists, wealthy widows and other questing souls to work his farm for him in exchange for sharing his wisdom. He offered numerous claims and explanations for everything under the moon, rooted in little more than his own imagination and never tempered with concern for what science might have to say about his musings."

Gurdjieff believed, for instance, in three centers, or “brains” in man: the intellectual, the emotional, the moving instinctive. In most people these three centers are at odds; Gurdjieff proposed to show how they could be brought into harmony. One step toward this is self-remembering; another is to stop what he called “identifying” – forming emotional attachments to objects, words, ideas- and to stop “considering”- caring about the opinions and prejudices of others.

Pupils also were expected to perform complicated exercises, derived from sacred d

s Gurdjieff had witnessed during his travels. Meanwhile, the pupil was to make difficult arithmetical computations in his head, while his emotions were brought into play by the repetition of a phrase such as “God have mercy!” Then, in the middle of a movement, Gurdjieff would shout “Stop!” and everyone had to freeze, holding his position if he could or dropping to the floor if he could not, until the Master cried, “Enough!”

" Timothy Marvel Hull's work, consisting mostly of graphite drawings on paper, occupies that particular space currently in vogue among certain young artists who draw - which is to say, he works with esoteric metaphysical imagery, using intricate patterns and figurative abstraction, aspiring toward some transcendental end. Hull's pieces currently focus on subject matter pertaining to Sufi philosopher G.I. Gurdjieff - his likeness, devotees such as writer Katherine Mansfield, and the ecclesiastical buildings associated with his Institute for the Harmonious Development of Man. Each is drawn deftly, intricately, and mathematically, as if Emma Kunz had been lured into portraiture and still lifes. Certainly many of Hull's pieces are gorgeous and supremely crafted. They are rigorous in their detail. The artist wouldn't be the first to treat Gurdjieff as the apotheosis of self-awareness, but somehow Hull falls short of such worship, slimly tending to the side of inquiry...."

Many of the techniques Gurdjieff used are familiar to psychotherapists; others are age-old devices of psychic conditioning and personality control. In his lectures and anecdotes he drew, often word for word from Sufism, Buddhism, Vedanta, Yoga practices, dervish dances; but he usually transformed them in some personal way. Reaching people at a time of confusion and despair, these ideas, derived from the Eastern tradition of inner wisdom and detachment and transmitted through Gurdjieff’s abundant energy and imposing logic, struck many intelligent people as a revelation.

Isadora Duncan:This awakening of the soul was the first step in dance as she conceived it. Duncan's mission in life was to counteract the materialistic influences of civilization that held the power to zap the inspiration (spiritual power and grace) she believed was inherent in all children. To accomplish this goal she requested that individuals first, "teach little children to breathe, to vibrate, to feel, and to become one with the general harmony and movement of nature. Let us first produce a beauitiful human being, a dancing child". The atmosphere associated with the Duncan School was/is one of comraderie rather than competition. Isadora was a student of the legendary G. I. Gurdjieff at his institute near Paris, France.

When Ouspensky met him, Gurdjieff was commuting between groups of followers in Moscow and St.Petersburg. But the Russian revolution was approaching. With magnificent indifference to the surrounding chaos, Gurdjieff continued to teach, but eventually he was forced to collect a few disciples, Ouspensky among them, and take refuge in the small town of Essentuki, on the Black Sea. There he conducted extensive lectures and set out every aspect of his system in its main outlines. It was during this period that Ouspensky began to have doubts about Gurdjieff, and that finally led to the separation of the two men.

As the civil war spread, Gurdjieff moved from a succession of stops, eventually raising the money for a down payment o a chateau outside Fountainbleau in France, called the Prieuré d’Avon, and opened the Institute for the Harmonious Development of Man. Ouspensky felt Gurdjieff’s “outward form was somewhat in the nature of a caricature.” Caricature or not, the institute at Fontainbleu became a mecca, during the next decade, for all sorts of people: White Russian émigrés, dissatisfied intellectuals from Britain and France, doctors, psychiatrists, artists, American socialites, curious ex-Theosophists,young and gifted people with no settled aim but a yearning toward the supernatural. Some came for a week or two, others for a few months, a handful for years….

"Gurdjieff's practice of self-observation entails the observation of all of our functioning - our thinking, our emotional states as well as our physical postures, gestures and movements. The pitfall to self-observation that Gurdjieff warned against was analysis. I see it as being similar to the second pitfall to the Alexander Technique in that they both have the hidden agenda of self-judging. (Thus, the picture selected for this post - the people at the table represent our various "I"s heavy into self-judgment.) This is how Gurdjieff described this pitfall: "Self-observation, especially in the beginning, must on no account become analysis or attempts at analysis....In trying to analyze some phenomenon that he comes across within him, a man generally asks: 'What is this? Why does it happen in this way and not in some other way?' And he begins to seek an answer to these questions, forgetting all about further observations. Becoming more and more engrossed in these questions he completely loses the thread of self-observation and even forgets about it. Observation stops. It is clear from this that only one thing can go on: either observation or attempts at analysis."---

Gurdjieff’s ideas, radical and unsettling as they are, are not as unique as many of his followers have claimed. To explore how they tally up next to the work of Rudolf Steiner or C. G. Jung would  a life’s work in itself.  Scholars such as Patterson have indicated how some of Ouspensky’s own ideas, arrived at independently before he met Gurdjieff, are similar to those he would receive from his
master. Little has been written about the work Ouspensky did in the years prior to hitching his star to Gurdjieff’s wagon.

That Ouspensky’s ideas were instrumental in providing a theoretical framework for early Russian modernism is still too
little known, but perhaps one of those hidden levers that seems to animate Russian mysticism and its exportation to the West in a new and hybrid occult form. Apparently  Ouspensky’s influence on the avant-garde movements of the early twentieth century, or about his importance for writers like Aldous Huxley,J. B. Priestley, and Malcolm Lowry is not negligible. It’s a commonplace that opposites attract, and in Gurdjieff and Ouspensky’s case, this may have been the scenario. But they often also repel, and at some point in their association, the magnetic energies of these two men began to push them apart.


… The sheep consequently often wandered into the forest, fell into ravines and so on, and above all, they ran away, for they knew that the magician wanted their flesh and their skins, and this they did not like.

At last the magician found a remedy. He hypnotized his sheep and suggested to them, first of all, that they were immortal and that no harm was being done to them when they were skinned; that on the contrary, it would be very good for them and even pleasant; secondly he suggested that the magician was a good master who loved his flock so much that he was ready to do anything in the world for them; and in the third place, he suggested that if anything at all were going to happen to them, it was not going to happen just then, at any rate not that day, and therefore they had no need to think about it. Further, the magician suggested to his sheep that they were not sheep at all; to some of them he suggested that they were lions, to some that they were eagles, to some that they were men, to others that they were magicians. After this all his cares and worries about the sheep came to an end. They never ran away again, but quietly awaited the time when the magician would require their flesh and skins.” ( G.I. Gurdjieff )

Related Posts

This entry was posted in Feature Article, Ideas/Opinion, Literature/poetry/spoken word, Miscellaneous, Music/Composition/Performance and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>