Dreyfus: big lies and big sticks

Why we cannot forget Dreyfus. It was the end of the nineteenth century and his exoneration in 1906 coincided with the birth of modernism. The double agents, perfidious generals, conniving politicians and anti-Semites posing as patriots have remained on the political scene ever since…

…As yet unaware of Gen. Auguste Mercier’s dereliction in the trial, Lt. Col. Picquart, an honorable but disciplined officer, made no public protest. For his own protection, however, he left with his lawyer a confidential summary of his role in the Esterhazy investigation. When its substance accidentally leaked out, the Dreyfus case truly became The Affair. An equally accidental revelation of the scandalous trial procedure fueld the public controversy that now erupted.

Image: Henri Biva—Then black comedy was piled on stupidity. It turned out that Schwarzkoppen, the German military attaché, had begun an erotic affair with Major Alessandro Panizzardi, the Italian military attaché—it was not called the gay nineties for nothing—and that they wrote to each other in an allusive and sinister-sounding private code. One of their letters, stolen from a second source, included a reference to someone whom Schwarzkoppen called “this scoundrel of a D.,” and who had offered “plans of Nice”—though the whole thing may have been a bantering reference to another lover. (The letter ends, to give a taste of the whole, “Don’t exhaust yourself with too much buggery.”)
Despite its obviously louche tone, this letter was submitted to the judges in a “secret dossier,” which Dreyfus and his lawyers were not allowed to know about, let alone see. (One of the smaller ironies of the affair is that it involves the collision of two subcultures, ambiguous Jewish identity and the obliquities of gay “coding,” that did so much to make the modernist sensibility.)
Read more http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2009/09/28/090928crbo_books_gopnik#ixzz2AyqiEG3V

Spearheaded by Bernard Lazare, a clear-minded, courageous Jewish man of letters, and Joseph Reinach, a noted historian-politician, Dreyfus’s champions organized the first mobilization of intellectuals in modern history. The present usage of the word, and the now classic rites of intellectual protest, stem from the affair. Peguy, the young Proust, and a whole cluster of noted scholars were prominent in the movement; Clemenceau, Jaures, and a respected Alsatian senator, Auguste Scheurer-Kestner, supplied the political-journalistic heavy artillery. Emile Zola in his J’Accuse, bitterly castigated the general staff, and became a symbol for the Dreyfusards when he was arrested for libel. French public opinion became increasingly polarized between Dreyfusards and anti-Dreyfusards.

—A saga of iniquity began that represents the essence of the
Dreyfus affair. The army had wanted no publicity and a quick conclusion
to the matter. However, no motive had been shown why a wealthy
captain, with a promising career, would have acted as claimed. The
motive hinted at was Dreyfus’s origin in Alsace, his knowledge of the
German language and his Jewishness. Religious newspapers like La
Libre Parole and La Croix supported the conviction whenever it was
questioned. As the growing evidence of wrongdoing mounted, these
forces in government, in the army and the Church railed against the
questioners. For them, patriotism demanded unquestioning loyalty. But
the questioners would not let up.
A second letter is discovered: The case against Dreyfus began to
collapse in March 1896 when another letter was intercepted in the
German embassy. This could not have involved Dreyfus, safely locked
away on Devil’s Island. Because a new government had taken office in
Paris, the Dreyfus file was reopened. A military official, Georges
Picquart became convinced, against his earlier belief, of the innocence
of Dreyfus and of the guilt of another army officer, Major Ferdinand
Walsin-Esterhazy.—Read More:http://www.hcourt.gov.au/assets/publications/speeches/former-justices/kirbyj/kirbyj_26mar06.pdf image:http://www.pinturasemtela.com.br/marc-chagall-%E2%80%93-pintor-ceramista/

The army, backed by most of the rightist, clerical, or simply conservative forces in the nation, dug in its heels. Through a succession of arrogant war ministers, it cowed a succession of timid premiers. The general staff ed the anti-Dreyfusard press with a steady flow of leaks,lies, and forgeries. One criminally irresponsible rumor, probably planted by Mercier himself- and unquestionably given credence by his refusal to deny it- had Kaiser Wilhelm II personally instructing his ambassador to meet Dreyfus’s price. Mercier was said to possess a photographic copy of the Kaiser’s handwritten dispatch, but the htreat of a declaration of war had forced the French government to return the original at the beginning of the Affair.

Dreyfus’s guilt became an article of faith in what almost seemed a new state religion: more fantastically,so for a time did the real culprit,  Esterhazy’s innocence. The impudent adventurer clearly terrified the French generals with his reckless interviews and unpredictable antics. At his own request, Esterhazy appeared before a court martial, which quickly exonerated him. A cheering nationalist mob carried him away in triumph.  ( to be continued)…


(see link at end)…Above all, many Frenchmen thought that France had lost the war because it had turned away from the faith. For the Paris of Dreyfus’s time was really a city of two towers—across the city from the Eiffel Tower, the Basilica of Sacré-Coeur, with its monumental bell tower, had been slowly rising since the eighteen-seventies, as a sort of counter-monument, done in a gargantuan Romanesque manner then seen as the true mystical style of Franco-Catholicism. It was dedicated explicitly to the expiation of the sins of 1870 and the redemption of France by a restored Catholic Church. Apollinaire used the two towers—one the shepherd of modern life, the other the fountain, the bleeding heart of the past—to structure his vision of the city in his great poem on Paris, “Zone.”

A saner response to the war had been to reform and democratize the French Army, by making its officer ranks meritocratic and national rather than aristocratic and narrow. Dreyfus, as a Jewish son of Alsace, took advantage of these reformist impulses, and came to Paris to become an artillery officer.* He did not fit the model of the traditional duelling and debauching officer, all scars and debts, but represented a new model, of the officer as bourgeois family man. He eventually settled with his wife and two children in a grand apartment on the Avenue du Trocadéro.

It was in that city of two towers, one finished and one rising, that, in the fall of 1894, Dreyfus

ame the accidental victim of a stupid plot, which was not, in its origins, anti-Semitic.

Read more http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/books/2009/09/28/090928crbo_books_gopnik#ixzz2AyqG8zZK

This entry was posted in Art History/Antiquity/Anthropology, Feature Article, Ideas/Opinion and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>