The idea behind gesture drawing is to suggest the essential feeling of a subject . You skirt the issue to arrive at an interpretation. The person is drawing not what the object under study actually looks like, but what the subject is doing. A summation in a few marks in a gestural fashion generally either circular or spiky. Drawing is associated with the right hemisphere of our brain, the side linked with visual perception whereas the left side, or L mode is considered verbal, analytic and logical by nature. Or some would have you believe…
Betty Edwards and Kimon Nicolaides are two drawing teachers and theorists who have developed teaching templates that permit almost anyone to acquire drawing skills. Edward’s theory is based on cerebral hemisphere and split brain research. The criticisms of Edward’s bestseller, ”Drawing On The Right Side Of The Brain” are related to excessive wordiness, rambling prose and fragmentary strokes of pertinent information. The book also requires extensive purchases of specialized art material to make full use of the excercices. Not surprisingly, Edward’s sells and promotes all the art supplies in the book. Also, the exercises are oriented towards beginners and those with a lack of confidence who are likely to be more vulnerable to purchasing material and absorbing inexact neurological theories.
However, most of the drawing exercises are relevent and accessible but, do not put the drawer in the position of the artist and create or provide the tools or inspiration to draw from an artistic perspective. The unleashing of the mad genius can’t be strapped in pedagogical sterility varnished with psuedo-science. The search for form and unity, plus the determination to articulate an artistic vision will create its own processes and catalyze creative problem solving in a way unique to the individual.
However, the extent of specialized brain function is an inexact science and Edward’s basis is scientifically inconclusive and perhaps simplistic to the point of pop psychology, where the number of exceptions is too high to form a coherent definition and mitigates the complex elements of bi-lateralization of brain functions and other issues academically evaluated and tested by accredited practioners of neurological research. However, Edward’s theories hold some validity with regard to predominantly right handed individuals. Nonetheless, only 20% of left handed people have right hemisphere dominance for language function. In general, applying elements of brain hemisphere theory to commercially promote products and services , goes far beyond the implications of the available reaearch and its intentions. Abuse, exaggeration and fantasy are common in the self help psychology and therapy books in the same way the astrology pages in the daily newspaper are related to Copernicus, Kepler and astronomical science. In short, its a credibility issue.
Kimon Nicolaides (1891-1938) is the author of ”The Natural Way To Draw” published in 1941. Edwards’s techniques are based on copy drawing, such as a live model and Nicolaides is a ”draw from Nothing” approach. He focuses on gestures, actions and weight. His introduction of feeling and expression with a representation elevate his book beyond the beginner level. But, its also demanding on time to complete the exercises ( three hours per day) but ultimately less useful and worthwhile than classic illustration techniques dating from the Renaissance period. Nicolaide’s techniques are not thought to translate well across diverse artistic styles.
mp;um=1&tbnid=1f33p5DHVr3lIM:&tbnh=102&tbnw=82&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dkimon%2Bnicolaides%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dsafari%26rls%3Den%26sa%3DN%26um%3D1">
Kimon Nicolaides
Hmm. Is it true? :-)
Thanks for posting your comment. The drawing instruction manuals will probably help ”anyone” draw. However, a figurative reproduction and art are not identical in spirit. Both books would be better in a condensed form. But then, any art instruction is better than none at all.
Dave
You not going to believe it but I have wasted all day searching for some info about this. You’re a lifesaver, it was a wonderful read and has helped me out to no end. Have a good one,Dynalite
I remember this blog. Obviously the issue is more complex than its promoters admit. And the book has a lot of detractors, but the subject matter is valid, especially for those who want the basics.
A thoughtful insight and ideas I will use on my blog. You’ve obviously spent some time on this. Well done!
I really dislike Man U , but thanks for reading. :)
I am fan of Nicolaides and have committed to completing the book. His goals and approaches fit very nicely with what I have searched for in instruction for 5 years. Slogging through his exercises are not without frustration, since I am often guessing about what I am doing. I started a blog to vent and give me purpose each day since his exercises focus on changing your brain and how to feel and experience something versus producing a beautiful art product. I felt I needed a mentor, but hit brick walls so hopefully some Nicolaides’ students will find solace with my experiences.
thx for posting this.
you are right, they are not really in the same category. However, this is an old article, and if I remember, Nicolaide’s theory, though more “academic” is not considered air-tight. It has its detractors. Edward’s book is a marketing phenomenon, a kind of democratization of drawing which is peculiar to the United States. Personally, I would assert that the basis for learning would have to begin with da Vinci and his uses of spheres and cylinders and perhaps with Vermeer whom Salvador Dali discerned the “rhino-horn”.