Darwin. His theories have already made one profound change in man’s ideas about himself and his world. An now with genetics we are entering phase two…
…The furor created by the publication of The Origin of Species was not due simply to the fact that it contradicted the literal word of the first chapter of Genesis. Many Christians had already reconciled themselves, for example, to interpreting the seven days allotted to the Creation in an allegorical sense. Religious doubt, that characteristic Victorian malaise, with its crop of social and spiritual catastrophes, of “dangerous” books and clerical resignations, had become almost a commonplace of the intellectual scene since the first impact of the new German criticism in the 1830′s.
The Origin owed its notoriety primarily to two things. First, it destryed at one blow the central tradition of rational Protestant religious apologetics- Natural Theology. All the beautiful and ingenious contrivances in nature, which Natural Theology had explained as the benevolent design of an Almighty Clockmaker, Darwin’s theory explained by the operation of natural selection: the struggle for life, preserving random hereditary variations.
Second, the Origin became notorious for something it did not say, though anyone who read it intelligently could not fail to be aware of the implication: that man was first cousin to-not descended from, though this was an error often made- the ape and the orangutan. As Darwin had written in his notebook, “animals may partake from our common origin in one ancestor…we may be all netted together.”
Darwin only completed this aspect of his work in his later books- The Descent of Man (1871) and The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals (1872)- but the public seized on it at once. Darwinism was “the monkey theory,” though monkeys are mentioned in the Origin no more frequently than other species. This was, however, the crux of the great Oxford debate in 1860 between T.H. Huxley and Bishop Wilberforce, at which Huxley made the famous retort, in response to the bishop’s gibe, that he would prefer to have an ape for a grandfather than a man “possessed of great means and influence” who used his influence to bring an important scientific discussion into ridicule. ( to be continued)…