DEAD PEASANT CLAUSE

”The British parliamentary tradition, which we inherited, resisted 19th-century Chartist demands for universal suffrage, based on similar fears that the elites would lose out, until they realized, to their surprise and delight, that it wouldn’t happen after all due to the clever machinations of party politics – which usually manage to subvert the real impulses of voters.Occasionally, a genuine democratic impulse expresses itself in the early phase of the system: elections, as in the victory of Barack Obama. But then the fail-safe parts kick in, through Congress or Parliament, and nothing much gets done. The result is, you can elect someone different, but they can’t do anything different. The system isn’t malfunctioning, it’s working perfectly.” ( Rick Salutin, Globe and Mail )

''Jack Morgan, called to testify by yet another set of Congressional investigators, had a circus midget plopped in his lap to the delight of a swarm of photo-journalists who memorialized the moment for millions. It was an emblematic photo, a visual metaphor for a once proud, powerful elite, its gravitas gone, reduced to impotence, ridiculed for its incompetence, and no longer capable of intimidating a soul.''

''Jack Morgan, called to testify by yet another set of Congressional investigators, had a circus midget plopped in his lap to the delight of a swarm of photo-journalists who memorialized the moment for millions. It was an emblematic photo, a visual metaphor for a once proud, powerful elite, its gravitas gone, reduced to impotence, ridiculed for its incompetence, and no longer capable of intimidating a soul.''

The Michael Moore documentary, Capitalism: A Love Story, scores points for deconstructing this relationship, or rather dysfunctional symbiosis between capitalism and democracy, with underlying subtext that the two are mutually exclusive and incompatible. In so doing, turning away the veil on precious assumptions centering on the American dream,  its Horatio Alger legends and the vision of someone making it big that continues to romance and seduce a public accustomed to fairy tales of Walt Disney and Hollywood. That Moore takes his vision in the form of an almost Dadaist film style loaded with pastiche, jump cuts and historical juxtapositions reveals an artistic finesse in using an art form, whatever one may believe in the actual content. This emergence of the financial class, and financial services, from service business to industry to the dominant economic activity in  North America is of some concern; one that has been voiced over many years yet, seems to be on an accelerating trajectory with expanding globalization.

Capitalism: A Love Story

Capitalism: A Love Story

At heart, is Moore’s view that capitalism, as economic engine, produces nothing of material value. This is a long and deep dispute with different groups placing a different gloss on the social values of modern capitalism. While the banks are ”too big to fail”, the beast may be too big to kill. Moore’s argument, long held, is their commercial activities undermine traditional ways of life and their complicity within government so entrenched and so influential as to totally suffocate the raison d’etre of the Constitution. There is a certain abhorrence in seeing the human pollution left in the wake of capitalism’s relentless march onward. The disparity of income and both urban and rural blight throws into sharp context the notion of a the average citizen held hostage in a New Babylonian exile. The blue chip corporation taking out life insurance policies on high yielding potential mortalities among their employees, known as ”dead peasant” clauses, recalls their involvement in the Third Reich before prior to WWII.

''To me the title reeks with what I hate about Michael Moore - his arrogance.  Especially considering that all too often his films are about hamming it up and blowing things out of proportion in order to have his films make more money - which is capitalism at it's finest.''

''To me the title reeks with what I hate about Michael Moore - his arrogance. Especially considering that all too often his films are about hamming it up and blowing things out of proportion in order to have his films make more money - which is capitalism at it's finest.''


Is Christianity and banking compatible? Yes,” said John Varley, chief executive of Barclays PLC. “And is Christianity and fair reward compatible? Yes.”… Lloyd Blankfein, CEO of Goldman Sachs Group Inc., told the Sunday Times of London he is “doing God’s work.” And Goldman international advisor Brian Griffiths was even more explicit in aligning his work in high finance to the “message” of the Gospels: “The injunction of Jesus to love others as ourselves is an endorsement of self-interest,” Mr. Griffiths was reported as saying. “We have to tolerate the inequality as a way to achieving greater prosperity and opportunity for all.” ( Charles Lewis, National Post, nov.14/09 ) Amen; no need to flip coins into the collection tray, we’ll just take it off your monthly statement.

There is no doubt that capitalism has been the most important force in shaping the fate of people in the modern world. Capitalism’s ability to avoid violence is likely, largely based on an underlying assumption that consumption, in ever increasing degrees, saturates the citizen with a level of passivity; a drug providing a sensation of being comfortably numb. Capitalism is so intimately glued to the conception of western thought that separating the two would result in multiple metaphors and identities each embodying elements of capitalism; a nihilistic exercise that would result in a social therapy of ”primal scream” proportions.

''...a more restrained Moore comes across as more fair and even handed than he has in years (a couple of instances of families being evicted from their homes do not provide their back story, giving us no idea of how complicit these people were in their own financial ruin.) I expected a rant at Wall Street greed that might delve historically back to Reaganomics, but Moore goes deeper still, back to the post WWII boom that, until a few years ago, gave most Americans a feeling of safety.''

''...a more restrained Moore comes across as more fair and even handed than he has in years (a couple of instances of families being evicted from their homes do not provide their back story, giving us no idea of how complicit these people were in their own financial ruin.) I expected a rant at Wall Street greed that might delve historically back to Reaganomics, but Moore goes deeper still, back to the post WWII boom that, until a few years ago, gave most Americans a feeling of safety.''

Moore’s implicit and explicit thesis that the financial collapse of Wall Street in September, 2008 was a planned and foreseen in not novel, and is a result of reflection of past crises in which the industry has been called on the carpet, a few scapegoats flogged, and after some media created penitence, the institutions rise like a Phoenix. Regarding the Pecora commission following the collapse of 1929:
”Under the merciless glare of Congressional hearings, above all the Senate’s Pecora Committee (named after its bulldog chief counsel Ferdinand Pecora), it was revealed that Jack Morgan and his partners in the House of Morgan hadn’t paid income taxes for years; that “Sunshine” Charlie Mitchell, head of National City Bank (the country’s largest), had been short-selling his own bank’s stock and transferring assets into his wife’s name to escape taxes; that other financiers just like him, who had been hero-worshiped for a decade or more as financial messiahs, had regularly engaged in insider-trading schemes that made them wealthy and fleeced legions of unknowing investors.

''WASHINGTON - SEPTEMBER 29: Actors portraying bank CEOs that received bailout money pose for a photo on </p><div style=

red carpet of the Washington DC premiere of 'Capitalism: A Love Story' at AMC Uptown Theater on September 29, 2009 in Washington, DC.''" width="594" height="463" />

''WASHINGTON - SEPTEMBER 29: Actors portraying bank CEOs that received bailout money pose for a photo on the red carpet of the Washington DC premiere of 'Capitalism: A Love Story' at AMC Uptown Theater on September 29, 2009 in Washington, DC.''

The Pecora Committee was not the only scourge of the old financial elite. Franklin Delano Roosevelt, as publicly mild-mannered as and perhaps even more amiable and charming than President Obama, began excoriating them from the moment of his first inaugural address. He condemned them in no uncertain terms for misusing “other people’s money” and for their reckless speculations; he blamed them for the sorry state of the country; he promised to chase these “unscrupulous money changers” from their “high seats in the temples of American civilization.”

The difference between the misguided speculator, reckless retail investor and the confidence man’s outright felonious behavior may simply be a matter of scale. At least, under circumstances of terminal systematic breakdown the distinction is at best hazy. And where there is smoke, there surely must be fire. The stock markets have enjoyed a fabulous recovery, but as many analysts have pointed out, the root problems have, by design, simply been deferred to a later date. Like the 1930′s the present day American financial system seems like nothing more than a confidence game. Madoff is simply a symbol, a metaphor and sacrificial lamb for an entire system construed as a Ponzi scheme:

”Madoff’s $50 billion game was something else again. It was completely dependent on his ties to the most august circles of our financial establishment, to major hedge funds and funds of funds, to top-drawer consulting firms, to blue-ribbon nonprofits, and to a global aristocracy of the super-rich. True enough, people of middling means, as well as public and union pension funds, got taken too. At the end of the day, however, Madoff’s scheme, unlike Ponzi’s, was premised on a pervasive insiderism which had everything to do with the way our financial system has been run for the past quarter century.”( Steve Fraser )

At the heart of Moore’s argument is the financial sector promoting self-interested egoism at the expense of Christian fellowship and by extension religious fellowship it would appear.With Moore,there appears to be an innate suspicion of commercial activity present among the originating concepts of the Christian tradition, with its Gospel account of Jesus, rage at the money changers working on the grounds of the Temple.Theologically, he represents Christianity’s spiritual preparation for the afterlife rather than earthly endeavors. Thus, there is an incompatibility between liberal individualism and rights of private property against clerical establishments and state regimentation of moral norms.There is a long history of financial activities being seen as contemptible yet indispensable, a tug of war in which the general values of Christianitydid not purport to apply to the government of society. ”My kingdom is not of this world”, Jesus tells his followers, and that void must be filled by ”something else” which is central to Moore’s debate.

Commercial influence is seen as undercutting the passion and vitality of human life in favor of soulless economic calculation. One of the conclusions that may be drawn is from Babson College’s Frank Genovese, an economist who advocated the abolishment of inheritance as a means of abolishing the socially destructive prejudices inherent in a pyramidal system of highly concentrated wealth among the country’s leading families. The question to be asked is that whether the increasing ”spirit” of capitalism in our society turns everyone into capitalists whether by choice or circumstances. The world power of money only permitting the human spirit to function in ”practical” terms; people without any share in or emotional commitment to society as a whole and so could watch its old traditions, methods and institutions being demolished without remorse.

Related Posts

This entry was posted in Cinema/Visual/Audio, Feature Article, Literature/poetry/spoken word, Marketing/Advertising/Media, Miscellaneous, Modern Arts/Craft and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.